Rethinking Anarchism

Where is Detroit?
February 25, 2009, 1:43 am
Filed under: Analysis | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

This past weekend, I had the once-in-a-lifetime experience of being guided through Detroit by a working class militant who has spent the last 36 years in the city. In front of a backdrop of rusting factories and rotting houses, he soliloquized on  the long ebb of the tide of organizing in a city that once was both the crown jewel of industrial capitalism and a burning hot bright spot of working class radicalism.

His story is the tale of a long-lost left, of organizers’ iron optimism and steely commitment to a Revolution that has not yet happened. As the machinery of the Motor City  goes, so go the motors of struggle built by the last generation.

In the 1970s, Detroit drew  a turbocharged mixture of young workers and young radicals. The auto industry was the “most advanced sector” of production. All industries served as inputs to auto manufacturing, and autos in turn shaped the geography of postwar development. Factories like Ford’s “Rouge” plant employed up to 100,000 workers. The social structures that grew around this system of production set the paradigm of normality for generations of workers in the entire country. Americans were told that “What’s good for General Motors is good for America.” Detroit was the heart of the economic, political, and social life of a nation.

Because of this, the city and its industry were a magnet for organizers seeking to overturn the economic, political, and social structures of capitalism. By the 1970s, an alphabet soup of left groups had established bases in Detroit. The cadre of these organizations entered the factories, intending to organize struggles in the heart of the capitalist system. A revolution based in the factories of Detroit would have unparalleled global ramifications.

Fueled by this belief, organizers toiled away, building motors, and motors of struggle. The years passed, and attrition amongst the cadre accelerated. By the late 1980s, the decay of the auto industry was mirrored by the disbandment of many left organizations. Militants left the factories and were not replaced by a fresh wave of organizers. The motors were idled, then scrapped.

The destruction of these motors of struggle is based on subjective and objective failures. Subjectively, few militants are willing to spend years of their lives build ing a long-term revolutionary project. This leads to the burnout of the hard core of activists who keep organizing going. Objectively, for the few people who are serious enough to want to organize, it is now unclear where we might make the most effective intervention.

Since the 1970s, the globalization and informatization of capitalism led to the creation of a globally networked, decentralized system. It is now much harder to find strategic points for organizing. Where would radicals who want to build workers power in the belly of the beast even go these days? Where is our Detroit?

If we can answer this question, then perhaps we will be able to push each other to rise to the occasion of building new motors of struggle, maybe even with some improvements on the previous models.


Crash Course on Anarchist Organizations
February 5, 2009, 6:19 am
Filed under: Random Shit

A friend and I are co-facilitating a class on Anarchist organizations. We’re hoping to figure out what an Anarchist organization should do. You can sign up for it here: Here’s the class description:

Anarchist Organization? Isn’t that a contradiction in terms? Not necessarily. Anarchy, anarchist, and anarchism are contentious words.
Depending on who you ask, these can conjure up associations with punk rockers, hippies, window smashing masked protesters, presidential assassins from a century ago, general social disorder, and a number of other things. Aspects of these associations are warranted but all of them are vast oversimplifications of a complicated body of ideas, actions, groups, and movements with a very long history.
In this discussion group we will focus on contemporary anarchist organizations. We will read and discuss the principle public statements from groups such as WSA, WSM, NEFAC, IWA, FdCA, Solidarity Federation, and more from the alphabet soup of left libertarians. We will also read occasional older works that current groups take as key touchstones of anarchist ideas. If “anarchist” and “organization” sound to you like a contradiction in terms, come find out why some anarchists don’t think this is so. Anyone who is nice is welcome.
Our first meeting will be at 2pm Sunday January 18th at the Hard Times Café.
Visit the class website at for more information, or email to register!
Day 1: Introductions, Review Readings
Day 2: Love and Rage, A-Fed and Class War
Day 3: Anarcho-Syndicalism
Day 4: The International Workers Assocation, Part 1: WSA (ex-affiliate, no longer part of IWA)
Day 5: IWA, Part 2: CNT, SAC, Solidarity Federation
Day 6: Anarchist Communism and the Platform, Part 1- NEFAC, WSM
Day 7: Anarchist Communism and the Platform, Part 2- FdCA, Zabalaza
Day 8: Especifismo, Latin American Anarchism